Public & Government Affairs

Germany’s 2025 Federal Election: A Turning Point for M&A and Foreign Investment?

Download a PDF of this article

Political Dynamics and Regulatory Scrutiny – M&A in Germany’s Multi-Level Political System

Germany’s federal structure plays a critical role in shaping the country’s M&A landscape. Unlike in France or the United Kingdom, where national governments predominantly determine regulatory and political conditions for corporate transactions, Germany’s decentralized political system means that state-level governments often exert considerable influence. This is particularly relevant when state and federal governments are led by different political parties, as conflicts between these levels of government can impact M&A processes. In this environment, maintaining strong relationships at both federal and state levels is not just beneficial – it is essential.

Beyond compliance with EU and national antitrust regulations, Germany has intensified its scrutiny of foreign takeovers in response to geopolitical shifts and the escalation of international crises. The federal government has become more cautious about technology transfers to non-NATO countries and states with which Germany does not maintain close diplomatic ties, occasionally blocking transactions on national security grounds. At the same time, there is a strong desire within German and European politics to strengthen the continent in relation to other global regions, which includes fostering strong companies and forming corporate alliances to build European champions and remain competitive internationally. As a result, M&A considerations now extend beyond traditional regulatory concerns to include broader economic and strategic interests, as seen in sectors such as defense and logistics.

Given the political sensitivities surrounding these processes, M&A strategies must incorporate proactive engagement with both the federal government and key members of parliament from the governing parties. Policymakers in the governing coalition often shape the political narrative around M&A, and discussions at various political levels can therefore yield valuable insights that influence deal strategy and execution.

Election Scenarios and Implications

The upcoming German federal elections on February 23, 2025, are expected to significantly influence the country’s M&A landscape. A change in government could lead to alterations in regulatory frameworks affecting M&A activities. For instance, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its leader, Friedrich Merz, have expressed intentions to implement policies that may include deregulation and tax reforms aimed at stimulating economic growth. Such measures could reduce bureaucratic hurdles, lower corporate tax rates, and create a more favorable environment for both domestic and cross-border M&A.

Additionally, the composition of the new government will influence Germany’s stance on foreign investments and inbound M&A. A coalition featuring parties with a more protectionist stance could tighten foreign investment controls, particularly in strategic industries. Greater scrutiny of foreign takeovers and a more interventionist approach to economic policy could create new complexities for investors targeting German companies. Conversely, a government favoring open markets might adopt a more welcoming approach to foreign investors. Ultimately, the election’s outcome will determine the regulatory trajectory and political climate for M&A transactions, shaping Germany’s openness to inbound M&A and its ability to foster corporate growth in an evolving global economy.

In summary, the 2025 federal election will be a pivotal event for M&A stakeholders. With potential shifts in regulatory frameworks, investment policies, and economic priorities contingent on the resulting German government coalition, dealmakers must stay attuned to political developments and engage strategically with policymakers to navigate the evolving landscape effectively.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of FTI Consulting, its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals.

©2025 FTI Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. www.fticonsulting.com

Related Articles

4th Annual Shareholder Activism State of the Market

September 8, 2025—4th Annual Shareholder Activism State of the Market Request Report The 4th Annual Shareholder Activism State of the Mark...

Use It or Lose It: U.S. Hydrogen Industry Must Act To Maintain Momentum

July 12, 2025—Key takeaway: Following the passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, time is of the essence for hydrogen produce...

Quick Analysis: ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Drives More Gas and Batteries, Less Renewables

July 3, 2025—With the recent passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (“OBBB” or the “Legislation”),[1] FTI Consulting’s...

Done Deal – Insights from our M&A and Activism team – June 2026

June 24, 2026—Insights from our M&A and Activism team Welcome to the latest installment of Done Deal. This month, Senior Consultan...

IR Monitor – 24 June 2026

June 24, 2026—In this week’s newsletter: The stories that investor relations professionals need to read this week: IR in Kazakhstan:...

Mehr als nur Zahlen: Social Media und die Kunst der Ergebniskommunikation

June 24, 2026—Social Media Monitor 2026: Eine Analyse der Nutzung von Social Media durch DAX-40-Unternehmen in der Finanzkommunikation...