Defense Companies in the Crosshairs – Executive Compensation Comes Into Focus
Managing Director, Human Capital Services, Corporate Finance & Restructuring
[email protected]
Senior Managing Director, Aerospace & Defense, Strategic Communications
[email protected]
Managing Director, Corporate Governance, Strategic Communications
[email protected]
The Executive Order issued on January 7th does more than target capital allocation decisions by defense contractors. It also directly reshapes how executive compensation can be structured under U.S. defense contracts—particularly for companies that fall behind on cost, schedule, or production commitments.
Here's What's Changing
For future and renewed defense contracts, executive incentive compensation may no longer be tied to short-term financial metrics such as earnings per share or buyback-driven free cash flow. Instead, incentives are expected to align with operational outcomes, including on-time delivery, production speed, capacity expansion, and execution of required investments. For many defense companies, this represents a material shift away from long-standing incentive designs built around financial performance as a proxy for execution.
The Order also establishes a remediation framework for existing contracts. Where a contractor is identified as underperforming, executive incentive arrangements may be reviewed as part of corrective actions, and executive base salaries may be temporarily capped at current levels (with inflationary increases permitted) while alignment is assessed. While not intended to be punitive, this elevates executive compensation from an internal governance matter to a visible element of contractor accountability.
The timing of the executive order relative to most companies’ compensation cycle and reporting calendar puts compensation committees in a peculiar position.
- First, committees need to determine if adjustments to awards being granted in 2026 should be made, and how. This can be complicated as the parameters defined in the executive order may not be perfectly aligned with shareholder preferences or could introduce retention risks to adjacent industries.
- Second, most U.S.-listed companies will be filing their proxy in the coming months. These proxy statements will detail compensation for 2025, and for most companies, the 2025 compensation awarded to executives very likely does not perfectly fit the terms of the executive order. While this makes perfect sense in terms of timing, it’s very likely reporters, politicians, and other stakeholders will find compensation paid to Named Executive Officers and question why it is out of line with the executive order.
What Does This Mean for Defense Companies
The implications extend well beyond compensation mechanics. Incentive design, capital allocation, operational execution, shareholder engagement, and disclosure are now tightly interconnected. Boards and compensation committees should assess whether existing incentive plans remain defensible under this new framework, particularly where financial metrics dominate. Companies should also consider whether compensation structures could become a point of scrutiny during a Department of War review, alongside buybacks, dividends, and investment decisions.
What Defense Companies Should Do Now
- Assess incentive plans against upcoming contract requirements
- Model operational performance metrics to replace financial measures where needed
- Evaluate executive employment agreements for flexibility during remediation
- Prepare clear governance and disclosure narratives explaining compensation decisions
- Consider engaging with shareholders on potential changes to compensation design
- Expect and prepare for scrutiny from reporters, politicians, and other stakeholders when filing upcoming proxy
In an environment where underperformance may be addressed publicly and at the highest levels of government, executive compensation is no longer a background governance issue. It is now part of how accountability, credibility, and readiness are judged.
How We Can Help
FTI Consulting is the leading global expert firm for organizations facing crisis and transformation, with more than 8,100 employees in 32 countries and territories. The firm brings together distinct capabilities and experts to serve as a trusted advisor to clients when they are facing their greatest opportunities and challenges. Our experts are recognized for the depth of their knowledge and a track record of making an impact. Collectively, FTI Consulting offers a comprehensive suite of services designed to assist clients across the business cycle—from proactive risk management to the ability to respond rapidly to unexpected crises and dynamic environments.
We welcome the opportunity for further discussion.
Related Expertise
The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of FTI Consulting, Inc., its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals.
FTI Consulting, Inc., including its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a consulting firm and is not a certified public accounting firm or a law firm.
FTI Consulting is an independent global business advisory firm dedicated to helping organizations manage change, mitigate risk and resolve disputes: financial, legal, operational, political & regulatory, reputational and transactional. FTI Consulting professionals, located in all major business centers throughout the world, work closely with clients to anticipate, illuminate and overcome complex business challenges and opportunities. ©2026 FTI Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. www.fticonsulting.com
