Financial Communications

UK and Ireland AGM Season 2023: Proxy Voting and Trends

The 2023 AGM season took place against the backdrop of a cost-of-living crisis, and an environment underpinned by growing shareholder scrutiny across a range of topics, such as board oversight and effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, and the growing focus on environmental and social considerations for companies. 2023 also constituted a “remuneration policy year” in the UK, with 107 remuneration policy proposals submitted for shareholder approval at FTSE 350 AGMs up to 31 May.

Average support for management proposals at FTSE 350 and ISEQ 20 companies decreased slightly from 97.4% in 2022 to 97.1% in 2023. While this represents a relatively marginal fall overall, it is largely attributable to lower levels of support for remuneration reports and share issuance proposals. It is also worth noting that the number of resolutions which received opposition from shareholders of 40% or more was higher in 2023 than in previous years (2023: 18 proposals; 2022: four; 2021: nine), including a record number of share issuance proposals (2023: 10; 2022: one; 2021: nil). These voting outcomes were however not reflective of new governance trends but rather of company-specific activism situations.

In spite of the wider range of issues that companies and boards are being held accountable for, perceived poor remuneration practices remain the main source of shareholder dissent. Average support on remuneration reports decreased from 93.1% in 2022 to 91.9% in 2023, while the proportion of companies receiving significant dissent (20% or more against votes) on their remuneration reports increased from 9.0% in 2022 to 10.3% in 2023. Among companies who experienced such opposition, a majority related to boards’ handling of executives’ long-term incentives. Specifically, investors raised concerns regarding increases in grant sizes, particularly in the context of the cost-of-living crisis, new performance criteria not deemed sufficiently stretching, windfall gains in relation to incentives granted during Covid-19, and upward discretion applied to incentives vesting in 2023.

Only 5.3% of FTSE 350 and ISEQ 20 companies up to the end of May experienced significant dissent on one or more director elections in 2023, compared to 8.8% in 2022. Directors’ time commitments continued to be a concern raised by investors. Individual directors were also held accountable for specific issues such as a lack of board diversity or perceived poor remuneration practices; however, the pressure exerted in 2022 appears to have spurred action at companies, with improved practice resulting in a drop off in significant opposition.

While fewer companies tabled say-on-climate proposals in 2023, we do not believe that companies are facing lower pressure to implement rigorous ESG strategies. Regulations and voluntary frameworks continue to evolve; and investors continue to look for adequate data to manage ESG risks or capitalise on emerging opportunities. They will continue to engage with companies to obtain data; and others continue to pressurise companies to implement (and demonstrate) stronger management and oversight of better ESG practices.

Proxy Voting and Trends

0 %

Average support for management proposals at FTSE 350 and ISEQ 20 companies decreased slightly from 97.4% in 2022 to 97.1% in 2023.

0 %

Only 5.3% of FTSE 350 and ISEQ 20 companies experienced significant dissent on one or more director elections in 2023, compared to 8.8% in 2022.

0 %

The proportion of companies receiving significant dissent on their remuneration reports increased from 9.0% in 2022 to 10.3% in 2023.

Methodology

This paper analyses proxy voting results at FTSE 350 and ISEQ 20 companies for the period from 1 January to 31 May 2023, as well as the corresponding proxy voting outcomes in each of the previous four years. The results of Annual General Meetings (AGMs) are based on data from Diligent Market Intelligence obtained from companies’ disclosures. We have considered vote results excluding abstentions (legal basis). Accordingly, we have also defined instances of significant opposition (or dissent) in line with the UK Code as proposals receiving 20% or more of against votes.The paper also investigates voting patterns specific to different types of proposals.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of FTI Consulting, its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals.

©2023 FTI Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.

Related Articles

A Year of Elections in Latin America: Navigating Political Cycles, Seizing Long-term Opportunity

January 23, 2024—Around 4.2 billion people will go to the polls in 2024, in what many are calling the biggest electoral year in history.[...

FTI Consulting Appoints Renowned Cybersecurity Communications Expert Brett Callow to Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Communications Practice

July 16, 2024—Callow to Serve as Managing Director, Bolstering FTI Consulting’s Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Communications Prac...

Navigating the Summer Swing: Capitalizing on the August Congressional Recess

July 15, 2024—Since the 1990s, federal lawmakers have leveraged nearly every August to head back to their districts and reconnect with...

Protected: Walking the Tightrope: Navigating Societal Issues on Social Media 

July 13, 2024—There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.