But it may be less a question of whether NCAs require greater powers, and more one of better coordination between NCAs and Vestager’s own DG COMP.
European NCAs typically work in close cooperation when needed. In the Adidas case for example, close collaboration between French and German authorities led to the settling of the case in each of those jurisdictions once the company accepted to change its restrictive practices. This was a clear incidence of multi-jurisdictional probes with an outcome for the general European good.
It seems however that there is still something of a disconnect between activities on the national and EU level. Some may indeed wonder why DG COMP and NCAs were not able to work in parallel on antitrust probes into online travel agents (OTAs) such as Booking.com and Expedia. When a total of 16 NCAs have been looking into potential misconduct within the same sector there is a clear case for DG COMP to step in to lead an umbrella European investigation. Instead in this instance it stayed on the sidelines as an observer. While the question of NCAs’ powers is an open one, surely their efforts could also be strengthened by a better coordinating lead from the Commission.
The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of FTI Consulting LLP, its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals, members or employees.